Hello Defenders of the Globe.
I have heard much about Colonies recently. Shab mentioned them on CPAC a while back, PI posted deciding if they were to be a AR colony and CPGT has three. So what I am here fro today is to ask this question: Should we have colonies?
Basically, a colony would be an individual army that pays tribute to us in exchange for our protection. The colony may lend troops to us in big battles or fight in any war for us, etcetera. In exchange, we, being larger, would defend the army from any other armies wanting to fight the colony. The way I see it, it is a very closely bonded alliance between a large and small army.
I suggest before voting, read this brief post (it has pictures!):
http://cpacentral.wordpress.com/2011/06/05/done-colonizing-other-armies-good-or-bad/
I personally think it would be great. It would make us look how we are, a generous and peaceful but powerful army. Plus, there would be benefits. Like Shaboomboom said in the post, we could use them as an independent but totally under-our-command division to use in seperate rooms during BIG battles.
Filed under: Global Defenders |
First 😛 And imma be pissed if everyone just puts “Is this the Krusty Krab? No this is Patrick” choice, but I know you all will because you are immature noobs…. but your my immature noobs 😛
*whisper* and you can vote as many times as you want *whisper*
Jack, dont screw this up because you can vote multiple times
scratch that last part
u guys can colonize CW if ya want but more troops would need to join